If love is real, what does that say about the meaning of the universe?
If you are prone to depression, then you might be wise not to tackle the book of Ecclesiastes in the Old Testament. The author is billed as the Preacher (Qoheleth in Hebrew.) As a revered sage, he reflects upon his life obsession with discovering the meaning of life.
His conclusion is disappointing. Vanities of vanities!, he concludes, all is vanity (Ecclesiastes 1:2). The Hebrew might be more accurately translated as “mere breath” or “a puff of wind.” Nothing lasts. What is here today is gone tomorrow. And in example after example he drives that point home.
So what’s his advice for wise living?
This is what I have seen to be good: it is fitting to eat and drink and find enjoyment in all the toil with which one toils under the sun the few days of the life God gives us; for this is our lot. (Ecclesiastes 5:18)
This conclusion is the fruit of his lifelong pursuit of wisdom. He has read deeply. He has observed the world of both nature and human beings. He has applied all his rational powers to trying to understand it. His approach parallels that of most philosophers and scientists today.
The Dead End Search for Meaning
He comes to the same conclusion as many of them do as well. Years ago I read a book titled Why Does the World Exist? byJim Holt.* The author seeks to penetrate the mystery of existence by interviewing a number of distinguished philosophers and scientists, including Nobel laureates.
His interviewees offer a number of answers, some of which mirror those of various philosophers down through the ages. But what I found most curious was the number of cosmologists and physicists who said the end result of all of their scientific explorations was the conclusion that the world was meaningless. There is no discernable reason why the world exists.
It reminded me of something that the philosopher Bertrand Russell once wrote.
Even more purposeless, more void of meaning, is the world which science presents for our belief. Amid such a world, if anywhere, our ideals henceforward must find a home… that all the labours of the ages, all the devotion, all the inspiration, all the noonday brightness of human genius, are destined to extinction in the vast death of the solar system, and the whole temper of Man’s achievement must inevitably be buried beneath the debris of a universe in ruins – all these things, if not quite beyond dispute, are yet so nearly certain that no philosophy which rejects them can hope to stand. Only within the scaffolding of these truths, only on the firm foundation of unyielding despair, can the soul’s habitation henceforth be safely built.**
One gets the idea that Qoheleth would fit right in in the halls and classrooms of modern academia and scientific labs.
In an intellectual world in which only rational conclusions are accepted as valid, it seems to me that Qoheleth and his companions present a perfectly persuasive argument. The law of entropy suggests that a form of death is the irreversible fate of all that exists in the universe. And if you take up the task of trying to answer why evil exists, then you are probably hammering the nails into the coffin of meaningfulness.
But What About Love?
I was reading Ecclesiastes recently, as I have many times before. I noticed something peculiar this time. The author is convinced that God is real. But the author’s favorite image of God seems to be that of the judge. This leads to the book’s final note of advice:
The end of the matter; all has been heard. Fear God, and keep his commandments; for that is the whole duty of everyone. For God will bring every deed into judgment, including every secret thing, whether good or evil. (Ecclesiastes 12:13-14)
What is strikingly missing from the author’s reflections is any perception of God as a God of love. The theme of love is missing throughout the book. And I find myself wondering if that lack accounts for the author’s such dismal conclusions.
If love is real–and human experience says it is, even if in all the partial and broken ways we experience it–then there is a force at work in the universe that cannot ultimately be captured by human reason or scientific instruments. And may the meaningfulness of the universe be ultimately grounded in that reality? I would like to suggest that is not a phantom assumption.
Love Grounded in the Triune Character of God
I suggest that on the basis of the orthodox Christian assertion that God is triune–a Godhead that is not a singular, motionless monad, but a Godhead who is a unified, yet complex network of presences, presences that Christians have labeled Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.
When we confess that God is love, we are saying more than that God relates to creation–and to us–in love. We are saying that God is love within God’s own very being. The doctrine of the Trinity makes that very clear when it asserts that what constitutes the very being or life of the Godhead is the eternal dance of giving and receiving that goes on among the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. That dance is itself love.
Meaning is to be found and experienced within all our networks of love, but most especially in the network of love that constitutes the divinity. If God is love, then the universe that comes from him and is sustained always by him is grounded in love. And that will give the universe and human experience its ultimate meaning.
We may not be able to fully express what that meaning is in words, but we can be confident that when we experience love, we are experiencing in a deeply existential sort of way the meaning of our own lives as well as the meaning of the whole universe.
If all this is true, then Qoheleth’s search for the meaning of life takes on a whole different complexion. Let us indeed eat, drink, and be merry, but in the sobriety as well as the intoxication of love in all its many dimensions.
Writer’s Note: I recognize that I am likely to be vastly misunderstood in what I say if my reader limits his or her understanding of love to erotic love alone. When I talk of love, I have in mind the full spectrum of love as the Christian tradition has understood it. That includes erotic love, but even more importantly compassionate love, service love, and sacrificial love. For the Christian tradition, the highest expression of love was the love of Christ who accepted the suffering of the cross for the sake of the salvation of the world.
* Jim Holt, Why Does the World Exist?, New York: Liveright Publishing Company, 2012.
** Bertrand Russell, Why I Am Not A Christian, Simon And Schuster, New York, 1957, p. 106.
6 thoughts on “Qoheleth and the Trinity”
“All this I laid to heart, examining it all, how the righteous and the wise are in the hands of God. Whether it is love or hate one does not know.” Ecclesiastes 9:1
I think you’re right about Qohelet not assuming God loves humanity – because if we go by observation, experience, which is what wisdom is – we can’t know that. The evidence is too mixed. We can only know it from a source like revelation, by faith.
Thank you for your thoughtful response.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Gordon, this is really thought provoking! Jim and I had many discussions about our faith. I maintained that it was all based on love. Jim kept saying, “that is too simple. That is not an answer.” I don’t think we are meant to figure it out. What do you think? (That should keep you busy for awhile.) Judy
As I say in my column, I believe that love lies at the center of the universe, because God who is love lies at the center of the universe. All ultimately works for the full expression of love. But that does not mean that our own concepts of love are large enough to comprehend the full dimensions of divine love. God’s love in action often seems so confusing and puzzling. So the centrality of love can feel very obscured in the many contradictory things that constitute daily living. Thanks for taking time to comment on my post.
I believe the only reason for our existence is to take care of one another. I’ve never been able to find another good reason for us to be here if it is not to love one another. And that is the most difficult task I’ve ever faced.
May, thanks for your comment.